<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Circulatable: a Librarians Group &#187; Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circulatable.org/category/reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circulatable.org</link>
	<description>Public Library of congress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An old controversy</title>
		<link>http://circulatable.org/2006/07/10/an-old-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://circulatable.org/2006/07/10/an-old-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Library Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael gorman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules of grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singular strengths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circulatable.org/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In blog years, this one is ancient, but I was reminded of it by recent reading online. Michael Gorman took a lot of gripe for his comments about blogs and what it means to be among the Blog People: A blog is a species of interactive electronic diary by means of which the unpublishable, untrammeled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In blog years, this one is ancient, but I was reminded of it by recent reading online. Michael Gorman took a lot of gripe for his comments about<a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA502009.html"> blogs and what it means to be among the Blog People</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> A blog is a species of interactive electronic diary by means of which the unpublishable, untrammeled by editors or the rules of grammar, can communicate their thoughts via the web.</p></blockquote>
<p>What jumped out at me, though, is whether Gorman broke his own rule in Our Singular Strengths: “Respect all forms by which knowledge is communicated.”<span id="more-77"></span> This is according to a wikipedia entry, and therefore I am not sure of how well it reflects what Gorman actually wrote.</p>
<p>Since I have not read this work and cannot answer it for myself, but I have just placed a request for the book at my library. To be continued…</p>
<div id="seo_alrp_related"><h3>Posts Related to An old controversy<!--DONTREWRITE--></h3><ul><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2006/07/26/blog-rankings/" rel="bookmark">Blog Rankings</a></h4><p>Do any of you have a favorite place to check blog rankings? I check Technorati from time to time, but I think the results favor ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2007/02/19/changes-ahead/" rel="bookmark">Changes ahead</a></h4><p>Circulatable started as a simple blog for a few folks in library school to keep in touch with post-graduation news and thoughts on library-related events. ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2007/12/17/google-influenced-by-librarians/" rel="bookmark">Google influenced by librarians?</a></h4><p>The New York Times has a short piece on a new Google service called Knol that sounds like it could have been conceived by librarians: ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2005/12/29/web-2-0/" rel="bookmark">Web 2.0</a></h4><p>In the past couple of months there have been a growing number of references to “Web 2.0″ in the library world. See, for example, the ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2007/02/06/strategic-cataloging-objectives/" rel="bookmark">Strategic (cataloging) objectives</a></h4><p>I have wondered lately whether the fundamental goals of cataloging are at odds with the 21st century digital environment? In a digital world, we build ...</p></div></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://circulatable.org/2006/07/10/an-old-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dante, Homer, Garfield, &amp; Mother Goose!</title>
		<link>http://circulatable.org/2006/03/27/dante-homer-garfield-mother-goose/</link>
		<comments>http://circulatable.org/2006/03/27/dante-homer-garfield-mother-goose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collection Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blog Itself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonical literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mother goose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oclc member libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weirdness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circulatable.org/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stumbled across the top 1,000 titles held by OCLC member libraries in a item posted yesterday in the Comics Reporter. The author of the post was bemoaning the high ranking held by Garfield, (#15!), as possibly the comic with the widest distribution in libraries. The first few hundred titles in the OCLC list are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled across the <a href="http://www.oclc.org/research/top1000/complete.htm">top 1,000 titles held by OCLC member libraries</a> in a item posted yesterday in the <a href="http://www.comicsreporter.com/">Comics Reporter</a>.  The author of the post was bemoaning the high ranking held by Garfield, (#15!), as possibly the comic with the widest distribution in libraries.</p>
<p>The first few hundred titles in the OCLC list are mainly titles we might associate with classic canonical literature, with some classic children’s lit thrown into the mix.<span id="more-88"></span>  These would be books held widely in both public and academic libraries, I suppose.  Is there anything on this list that does surprise you?  Did you expect popular culture items to rank higher on the list?  And why did Garfield catapult to the top?  Weirdness.</p>
<div id="seo_alrp_related"><h3>Posts Related to Dante, Homer, Garfield, & Mother Goose!<!--DONTREWRITE--></h3><ul><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2006/12/15/advocacy-public-awareness/" rel="bookmark">Advocacy = Public Awareness</a></h4><p>In the new College and Research Libraries News you’ll find the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Annual Report for 2006. My eye was ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2011/07/03/an-alternate-view-on-the-catalog%e2%80%99s-purpose/" rel="bookmark">An alternate view on the catalog’s purpose</a></h4><p>I have to strongly disagree with what I saw as Nate’s primary point in his last post, What I want from a catalog. First, he ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2011/07/03/is-search-search/" rel="bookmark">Is search != search</a></h4><p>Here is a simple question with profound implications: is library search the same thing as the “search” in the way the population at large understands ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2011/07/30/what-books-would-you-suggest-for-building-a-high-school-library/" rel="bookmark">What books would we indicate for structure the tall propagandize library?</a></h4><p>My old high school, which my sister currently attends, is building up its library. The school is only four years old, and the library doesn't ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2006/08/01/pre-wiki-adventures/" rel="bookmark">pre-wiki adventures</a></h4><p>We have determined that our library could really enhance newsroom communication by creating an in-house wiki. Since no one has experience with this, my boss ...</p></div></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://circulatable.org/2006/03/27/dante-homer-garfield-mother-goose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://circulatable.org/2005/12/29/web-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://circulatable.org/2005/12/29/web-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Librarian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuzzy area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology trend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://circulatable.org/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past couple of months there have been a growing number of references to “Web 2.0″ in the library world. See, for example, the series of posts from ACRLog on implications for development of “Lib 2.0″. If a technology trend makes it to libraryland, chances are good it has already made some serious inroads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past couple of months there have been a growing number of references to “Web 2.0″ in the library world. See, for example, the series of posts from ACRLog on implications for development of “Lib 2.0″. If a technology trend makes it to libraryland, chances are good it has already made some serious inroads into other arenas.</p>
<p>The arguments for and against other recent hot topic issues that have met at the intersection of libraries with technology, such as blogging, wikis, tagging and folksonomies, seem to be over before they are begun (yes, they are all great, just take them in moderation and know both their strengths and their perils). However, this one, I believe, is very important. It is important because it has implications for the way that patrons will (and in many cases, already are) interact(ing) with information and how to make the Internet experience much better.<span id="more-114"></span></p>
<p>In reading up on this somewhat fuzzy area, I was glad to have finally found the website for the recent d.Construct 2005 conference. So my fellow circulators, I just wanted to pass on a snippet of recommended reading/viewing as we approach the new year:</p>
<p>Go read Andy Budd’s “What is Web 2.0″ presentation. I predict that any of us who have anything to do with the web will need to understand these concepts in the year of the dog…</p>
<div id="seo_alrp_related"><h3>Posts Related to Web 2.0<!--DONTREWRITE--></h3><ul><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2006/02/11/keep-the-cart-behind-the-horse/" rel="bookmark">Keep the cart behind the horse</a></h4><p>An extremely important point by Lorcan Dempsey on the impact of technology on libraries and the academic world: In fact, the effect of technology on ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2011/07/04/libraries-and-web-application-transparency/" rel="bookmark">Libraries and web application transparency</a></h4><p>I have continued to read a number of posts about Ajax, Web 2.0 and the current state of web applications since my previous post on ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2011/07/04/change/" rel="bookmark">Change</a></h4><p>I have been offline as far as RSS feeds are concerned and have just gone back to my Bloglines account to find 717 posts waiting ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2007/03/15/generation-g/" rel="bookmark">Generation G</a></h4><p>In the past couple of weeks I have had casual discussions with colleagues about the surge of Google in the university sphere. For example, our ...</p></div></li><li><div class="seo_alrp_rl_content"><h4><a href="http://circulatable.org/2008/02/03/know-yourself-first/" rel="bookmark">Know Yourself First</a></h4><p>It does not matter that Microsoft may buy Yahoo–the acquisition is based on a flawed premise. Technology companies cannot operate like the GEs and General ...</p></div></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://circulatable.org/2005/12/29/web-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/35 queries in 0.083 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 720/777 objects using disk: basic

Served from: circulatable.org @ 2012-02-06 22:51:55 -->
